Asbestos Litigation Cases - Individual Versus Class Action

In some cases, plaintiffs are pursuing individual lawsuits instead of a class action. Individual lawsuits can provide greater compensation for injuries caused by asbestos and mesothelioma.

Researchers have discovered that exposure to asbestos can lead to lung disease and damage. It can take several years for mesothelioma sufferers to develop the disease due to the 40-50 year time frame of latency.

The History of Asbestos Litigation

Asbestos suits are among the longest-running mass torts in U.S. History. It wasn't until the 1970s that federal and state courts started investigating asbestos cases, following medical research identified asbestos exposure as a cause of various illnesses, including mesothelioma, lung cancer, and various other illnesses such as asbestosis, pleural thickening and plaques of the pleura.

Many companies that mined asbestos, made asbestos products, and supplied asbestos products knew about the dangers but ignored or minimized the dangers. Many asbestos-related companies filed for bankruptcy due to lawsuits brought by victims and family members. The majority of companies that filed for bankruptcy set up asbestos trust funds as compensation to victims.

While the vast majority of asbestos-related claims settle out of court, a tiny amount of cases go to trial. In these cases, judges tend be skeptical of the defenses of the defendants. They are often able to give substantial verdicts to the victims. Asbestos lawyers have successfully navigated thousands of cases through the trial process and obtained significant verdicts for mesothelioma patients.

The complexity of an asbestos case makes it difficult to win. In an asbestos lawsuit plaintiffs must prove that their illness is caused directly by a company's exposure to asbestos, a dangerous substance. This is a requirement for a database that ties workers, their work locations, their employers, the products they used, and their suppliers and vendors. This process can take many years, especially if the victim's work history is complex. Interviewing family members and coworkers, abatement employees suppliers, and other parties who could be responsible may be required.

The evidence in an asbestos-related case requires expert witness testimony to support the claims of an asbestos-related disease. The majority of these experts are doctors who have been trained in the pathology of asbestos-related diseases, and who have examined the medical records of an individual. This is especially important in mesothelioma-related cases, as the disease can be extremely difficult to identify.

Defense lawyers can also attempt to discredit experts through their background or qualifications. This is a worrying pattern that has been seen in recent years, as defendants are increasingly challenging the world-wide scientific consensus that asbestos causes mesothelioma as well as other illnesses.

The First Case

Asbestos cases are unique from other personal injury lawsuits. The lawsuits are based on an uncommon disease that's caused by breathing in the microscopic fibers and subsequently developing mesothelioma or another asbestos-related disease. These types of injuries are typically caused by exposure at certain work sites, such as power plants, shipyards and construction projects.

Asbestos lawsuits are filed in a group-wide manner, not individually. This permits the victims and their families to file a single complaint against multiple defendants and receive compensation from a variety of sources of funds, which results in lower legal costs.

The first mesothelioma case was filed in 1927 by a seaman who was exposed to asbestos while working on the deck of a British ship. The victim was diagnosed with mesothelioma following inhaling asbestos-containing particles when constructing ships at Harland and Wolff Plc, an organization that made naval vessels for the Royal Navy and other clients.

A dock worker filed a lawsuit in the early 1990s following developing mesothelioma as a result of exposure to asbestos released by factories in which he worked. The victim's wife filed a lawsuit in federal court against five companies including Union Carbide Inc. and Montello Inc. who both manufactured valves that contained asbestos for oil rigs, industrial processes, and other industrial processes.

Other cases followed. In 1973, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals found asbestos manufacturers to be completely accountable (Borel v. Fibreboard) for any injuries to workers. The decision increased the volume of asbestos-related claims, putting asbestos manufacturers on notice that they could be sued over their products.

Lawyers representing plaintiffs in a lawsuit that involves asbestos must understand the complex chain of exposure. This involves establishing the victim's exposure and mesothelioma diagnosis, as well as identifying potential defendants. It is also about making sure that the lawsuit is in compliance with state laws and federal regulations that pertain to asbestos litigation, such as those that govern asbestos discovery procedures.

One of the most crucial steps is to choose an attorney who specializes in mesothelioma lawsuits. A reputable law firm will offer a free consult and examine the medical records of the client related to asbestos to determine eligibility for a asbestos lawsuit.

The Second Case

Asbestos sufferers have won significant awards in the courts, which are usually higher than what they would receive from a mesothelioma settlement offer or asbestos trust fund claim. Asbestos victims have been compensated for many reasons that include the psychological and physical damage caused by asbestos exposure. Researchers have found that asbestos workers are more likely to suffer from lung disease and lung damage as compared to those who do not work with it.

As such, a number of law firms that had vast experience in asbestos litigation filed huge mesothelioma lawsuits. It was a method to gain recognition and make money. However, this strategy did not serve mesothelioma sufferers well. The firms were able to take on more cases than they could handle and did not offer the medical support and representation mesothelioma sufferers deserve.

The defendants and insurance companies have also employed other strategies to stop asbestos claims. Insurance companies, for instance, argued that asbestos victims should be required to prove that the asbestos they were exposed to was the cause for their illness. This was a direct attack on the principle of joint-and-several liability, which permits the plaintiff to be held accountable for all damages that result from exposure to asbestos by multiple defendants.

This strategy was met with a spirited opposition from mesothelioma sufferers and their lawyers, who claimed that it would be unfair for asbestos victims to have to prove the cause of their illness to recover damages. This could also deter victims from bringing cases with reliable law firms and make them settle for less than their case is worth.

The House of Lords ultimately sided with the victims and rejected arguments of the insurers. However, this ruling did not affect the massive amounts of money that was given to asbestos victims by the insurance industry. It is crucial to select an asbestos compensation firm with a good reputation for competence and expertise. Thompsons Solicitors has run, and won, more asbestos compensation cases than any other UK law firm. We also were responsible for the first ever successful asbestos compensation case to the court in 1972.

The Third Case

Unlike most toxic tort lawsuits, asbestos cases involve very serious injuries to people whose lives were irrevocably changed by exposure to a deadly carcinogen. Mesothelioma affects the tissues surrounding organs inside, including the lung. The cancer may also be spread to the abdominal cavity and chest wall, heart, and even the brain. The disease can take a long time to manifest, and sufferers are often left to live with the knowledge of their terminal condition. Many who have been affected by asbestos have suffered many financial hardship, because they've been forced to sell homes and medical bills and make other expensive adjustments to their lives.

In You Tube have filed lawsuits against asbestos product suppliers and manufacturers. This is due to the fact that the law allows individuals to seek compensation for damages even after their businesses have filed for bankruptcy.

After paying billions of dollars in settlements to asbestos victims, a number of these companies were forced to shut down or shut down. However, there are a lot of plaintiffs looking to sue the remaining companies. The number of asbestos claims has actually increased.

Some of these cases are being manipulated to benefit certain attorneys and their clients. For example a judge from New York City recently made an order that reverses an old policy of not allowing mesothelioma lawsuits involving punitive damages. This was done in response to a lawyer for Garlock Gasket, a bankrupt asbestos manufacturer that has been sued by more than 30 mesothelioma sufferers.

This was only one instance, but it caught the attention of many. Many believe that the case is an indication of the fraudulent practices that are commonplace in asbestos lawsuits. The corruption scandal that afflicted the former New York Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver has brought more attention to the ties between trial lawyers and politicians, which may help bring balance to the system.

If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, or another asbestos-related disease, there's no time to lose in seeking legal representation. The most reputable mesothelioma attorneys will offer a free consultation to discuss your case with you and decide on the best strategy for you. The process of submitting an asbestos claim can take many months, therefore it is essential that you choose an attorney who is familiar with the complexities involved and how to achieve results.
You Tube