Asbestos Litigation

Each asbestos case is unique however the general procedure to defend against such claims is the same. Your lawyer will require you to conduct an interview with the plaintiff.

The source of asbestos exposure can be numerous, not just one company or employer. This is why asbestos cases typically involve multiple defendants.

Determine the source of exposure

In order to make an asbestos claim, it is crucial to pinpoint asbestos exposure. Often, attorneys representing victims can use medical documents to determine the source of asbestos. This could help victims receive compensation from the companies that are responsible for their asbestos exposure.

Mesothelioma victims and their families need compensation to cover expensive mesothelioma treatments. Compensation can also help families cope with the emotional burden of a mesothelioma being diagnosed.

Asbestos lawsuits are complicated legal cases, and victims must be aware of their rights and the way in which the process operates. Attorneys are able to handle a variety of aspects of a case, they are expected to be involved in the proceedings. This includes responding to discovery requests and participating in depositions in court.

It is also crucial to remember that the statutes of limitations in New York are limited, and it is crucial to speak with an experienced asbestos attorney as soon as possible. If you fail to file your claim within the stipulated time period, you could lose out on financial compensation.

In some cases asbestos-containing products manufactured by multiple companies have been used to expose victims. In such cases, the victims' attorneys will have to determine the source of all asbestos-containing products as well as the companies and contractors that supplied the asbestos-containing products.

Asbestos litigation is the longest-running mass tort in American history. It has been responsible for numerous bankruptcy filings filed by asbestos producers. Many of these companies have created trust funds to pay compensation to asbestos victims. However, asbestos defendants continue denying the evidence linking asbestos exposure to mesothelioma or lung cancer. This is despite studies conducted by doctors such as Dr. Irving J. Selikoff and Dr. www.youtube.com , and Dr. E. Cuyler Hammond, among others.

The process of creating the Database

A case involving asbestos-related diseases or mesothelioma differs from a typical personal injury claim. In many asbestos litigation cases, the plaintiffs are represented by the same law firms and the same expert witnesses.

To develop a successful asbestos defense, attorneys need to have access to an extensive database that can identify possible exposure sources. This involves reviewing the work site, speaking with coworkers and getting documents from employers and suppliers. This also involves finding and interviewing doctors and nurses who can testify regarding asbestos exposure.

The creation of this type of database can be challenging particularly in situations where the data was lost or destroyed over the course of time. In these cases it is possible to recreate a complete insurance program and claims database, using multiple sources like loss runs, claim files internal system, as well as defense counsel records. This can take many years or even years to complete.

Asbestos lawyers should also have access to a program that allows them to find potential exposure areas and identify potential defendants. Attorneys can save time and money by having this information available to them.

After the mass bankruptcies of asbestos producers attorneys for plaintiffs sought new defendants to list in their lawsuits. As a result of this asbestos cases in West Virginia are now defined by triannual consolidated trial groups where volume is the rule and suits naming less than 100 defendants is not common.

Identifying the Defendants

The actual basis of asbestos cases is often established through discovery. Asbestos companies have denied for a number of years that their products could cause harm, but when lawsuits started the company's documents exposed evidence of the dangers. These documents can be used to prove that particular defendants products caused injuries. To prevail in a lawsuit, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant's product was in use at the workplace, that the worker was exposed to it by inhaling dust, and that the exposure to the dust was a major reason for his injuries.

Because asbestos cases involve multiple defendants, the method of identifying defendants is different than an ordinary personal injury case. The key is to develop a database linking employers, locations and products through interviews with co-workers and relatives, reviewing invoices and work orders, obtaining documents from suppliers and vendors, and analyzing samples from the plaintiff's home and employment websites. The type of asbestos involved such as amosite, chrysotile or crocidolite - can also be helpful in identifying defendants because each product is made by the same manufacturer.

The defendants are required to thoroughly review these facts, and determine the possible sources of exposure. This can include a thorough review of more than 40 years of records from Social Security, tax, union, and other records of the worker. Because the time between asbestos injuries is so long, establishing an accurate database requires extensive and costly research.

Due to the sheer number of cases and limited resources of defendants Many asbestos cases are transferred to multi-district litigation (MDL) in federal courts. This gives defendants to share resources and avoid duplication of discovery.

Case Development

Asbestos suits require a lot of investigation and the review of a variety of documents. This can be a challenge since exposure to asbestos often was a long time before the victim became sick. To determine the source of the asbestos exposure, lawyers must conduct an interview and examine thousands of documents, such as employment records and union documents tax files, social security files and lab and medical reports.

The plaintiffs' attorneys must also do everything they can to find other defendants. In some cases, there can be up to 40 defendants. To achieve this, they must investigate the supply chain to find companies that could have a nexus with asbestos but who are not mentioned in the lawsuit.

This process can be extremely long and time-consuming, particularly when a claimant is suffering from mesothelioma and other severe diseases. Additionally, it is often difficult to locate witnesses and obtain physical evidence.

A mesothelioma lawyer will establish all potential defendants, and their relationship to victim's exposure. This could be accomplished by a thorough analysis of over 40 years of the victim's life via interviews as well as a review of their social security, union, and tax records.

A successful asbestos litigation strategy requires extensive experience in this complex legal field. Since its inception at the beginning of 1994, McGivney, Kluger, Clark & Intoccia has been at the forefront in asbestos litigation and is a national leader in defending businesses in multi-jurisdictional litigation that spans the entire industry. We are the National Coordinating Counsel and liaison counsel as well as coordinating the interests of many different defendants including product manufacturers, suppliers, distributors and contractors. We have extensive expertise in creating and establishing key defenses including expert witness testimony, jurisdictional Case Management Orders.

Prepare for Trial

Lawyers must carefully prepare their cases for trial to ensure that their clients' evidence and arguments are as strong as they could be. This includes reviewing medical records and preparing all witnesses. It is also about identifying the exhibits that will be used during the trial. This process can take years long in complex cases.

Before developing mesothelioma, many asbestos patients develop a lesser disease such as asbestosis, the pleural plaque or pleural fibrosis. Asbestosis symptoms include tightening of the lungs which may cause difficulty breathing, coughing, and chest pain.

Asbestos victims' lawyers must also scrutinize the evidence to find potential defendants who could be held accountable for the asbestos injuries. This may involve interviewing coworkers, family members, asbestos manufacturers, asbestos abatement workers and obtaining various documents.

After identifying a potential defendant An attorney must determine the liability of the party. The defendants could be individuals, companies or government agencies. They must be held responsible for their negligent acts.

Several legislative remedies to resolve asbestos litigation have been formulated in Congress. These efforts have not been successful due to a variety of complicated political issues. Asbestos victims, their lawyers and the government remain committed to holding negligent asbestos companies accountable for their conduct.

Waters Kraus & Paul is a law firm that has handled a variety of cases in New York State and across the nation. Our lawyers have held manufacturers, insurance companies and other responsible parties accountable for their role in the asbestos exposure. In Upstate New York, asbestos litigation is handled by five judicial districts where cases are assigned to judges who are familiar with asbestos-related issues.

The Asbestos Litigation Group welcomes all AAJ members including life, regular, sustainer, and President's club members. Members interact and discuss legal issues and strategies on the group's plaintiff-only list server at the annual and winter conventions and participate in educational seminars on asbestos litigation.
www.youtube.com