Organizing Microservices Source Code: Monorepo vs. Multirepo 🛠️
In microservices architecture, choosing between a single repository (monorepo) and *repository per microservice *(multirepo) is crucial. Here's a quick look at the pros and cons of each approach.

🗂️ Single Repository (Monorepo).

Issues as Code Base Grows:

1. 🔗 Dependencies: Allows dependencies between microservice codebases.
2. 🤝 Coupling: Risk of strong coupling between entities.
3. ⏳ Build Times: Slower builds as all services are built for every change.
4. 🚧 Build Breaks: A break in one service affects all.
5. ⏮️ Rollback: Rolling back one service may require rolling back all.

📂 Repository per Microservice (Multirepo)

Benefits:

1. 🚫 No Dependencies: Prevents dependencies between microservice codebases.
2. ⚡ Build Efficiency: Only build and verify the service that changed.
3. 🔀 Isolated Build Breaks: A break in one service doesn't affect others.
4. 🔄 Easy Rollback: Rolling back one service won't affect others.

Conclusion
Choose Monorepo When:

1. 📉 Small number of microservices.
2. 🌐 Prefer a unified codebase.

Choose Multirepo When:

1. 📈 Numerous, independent microservices.
2. 🚀 Need for rapid, isolated development and deployment.

Thank you for reading! If you found this post helpful, make sure to share it with your network. Let’s make microservices management easier and more efficient for everyone! 😊🔧🚀