Alternatives Available to Netnut

Lewis Kerr - Sep 20 - - Dev Community

Swiftproxy and Netnut are two reputable options for proxy users, offering reliable services for various purposes, including web scraping, bypassing geo-restrictions, conducting market research, and enhancing online privacy. Understanding their unique features can help you choose the best service for your needs. Let’s take a closer look!

Understanding Swiftproxy and Netnut

Both Swiftproxy and Netnut cater to private and business proxy users, providing a variety of IP types. Swiftproxy appeals mainly to budget-conscious users seeking high-quality services without high costs, while Netnut targets businesses with larger requirements, reflected in its subscription plans and pricing.

Proxy Network Services

Both services offer genuine rotating residential proxies sourced from real users, covering global locations and allowing users to target specific cities and states. They support HTTP(S) and SOCKS5 protocols, dual authentication, and unlimited concurrent sessions. However, each has unique features that differentiate them.
Swiftproxy
Swiftproxy provides ethically sourced residential IP addresses and operates on a pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing you to purchase only the traffic you need. In addition to competitive pricing, Swiftproxy offers bulk discounts, and its residential proxies come with non-expiring traffic, providing flexibility to use your purchased bandwidth whenever needed. Although the size of Swiftproxy’s proxy pool may not be its strongest point, features like high-quality IPs and precise sticky session control enhance its usability, allowing users to select the fastest IPs and maintain a single IP for durations between 1 second and 7 days.
Netnut
Netnut boasts a network of over 52 million residential IP addresses from real users in 200 countries, which is impressive, though details on their sourcing methods are somewhat lacking. While they provide both sticky and rotating sessions, the options are limited; you can either obtain a new IP for each request or maintain the same IP until it's released. Their pricing structure differs from Swiftproxy’s, using a subscription model with various monthly plans that include specific traffic amounts. There is a $20/month plan for 1 GB, but this option does not include API access or IP whitelisting. Overall, Netnut’s residential proxies are more suited for larger projects.

Proxy Pool Capacity

Understanding the size of proxy pools is crucial for ensuring confidence in proxy usage. A larger proxy pool generally means more available IPs, which can enhance stability and reliability.
Swiftproxy
Swiftproxy has a notable advantage in the proxy market, boasting a significant number of residential IPs and mobile proxies distributed across various countries. In tests with high volumes of requests, Swiftproxy showed a well-balanced proxy pool, especially with a large number of unique US IPs. In broader evaluations without location filters, it achieved an impressive count of unique IPs, showcasing its extensive reach.
Netnut
Netnut offers a smaller, yet still considerable, pool of residential IPs and mobile proxies, covering a wide range of locations. In tests conducted without location filters, Netnut returned a slightly lower number of unique IPs compared to Swiftproxy. However, it provided a higher count of US IPs when location filters were applied, though many of these were categorized as ISP proxies.

User Registration and Setup Process

The user experience during registration and account setup is essential when selecting a provider. Here’s a look at how Swiftproxy and Netnut handle registration.
Swiftproxy
Setting up an account with Swiftproxy is quick and straightforward, requiring only an email address and password. After email verification, you can start using the service. While their KYC policy may impose some initial limits on orders, users still have ample opportunity to test the proxies. Swiftproxy’s self-service model allows for easy ordering without needing support, and users appreciate the organized, intuitive dashboard that includes sections for different proxy types, quick-start guides, and a comprehensive Help Center. Orders are confirmed within minutes, enabling immediate proxy access.
Netnut
Registering for Netnut is more involved, requiring a valid email, phone number, social media contact, and details on how you plan to use the proxies. You must also select one of five methods to contact their sales department for account verification. Sales agents may request further information, and once you provide the necessary details, your account will be approved. The Netnut dashboard is user-friendly, focusing on statistics and including links to integration instructions, FAQs, available countries, and support contacts. Unlike Swiftproxy, Netnut does not offer a self-service option for proxy purchases.

Customer Service Interaction

Both Swiftproxy and Netnut provide 24/7 customer support through various channels, including live chat on their websites. However, the responsiveness and effectiveness of their support agents may differ.
Swiftproxy
Swiftproxy’s support team can be contacted via email, and their representatives are generally responsive, ready to assist with various inquiries at any time. Business clients also enjoy the benefit of a dedicated support manager. Additionally, Swiftproxy offers useful support tools and blog articles to help users implement strategies and optimize performance.
Netnut
Netnut provides multiple options for reaching their support team, including email, Skype, Telegram, Discord, WhatsApp, and live chat. However, when we tried to contact them via email and live chat, we experienced wait times of about an hour before receiving help. While the support agents were friendly and helpful once connected, the slow response time is an area for improvement. Customers on smaller plans only have access to email support, while larger plans come with a dedicated account manager.

Conclusion

Both Swiftproxy and Netnut offer reliable proxy services tailored to different needs, resulting in unique user experiences and pricing structures. Swiftproxy focuses on user-friendliness, affordability, and features like non-expiring residential traffic and precise sticky session control. Conversely, Netnut is geared toward large-scale applications, showcasing a substantial proxy pool and offering a 7-day free trial that reflects confidence in its service.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Terabox Video Player