Why Do Many People Not Recommend Using JWT?

Safdar Ali - Oct 3 - - Dev Community

JSON Web Tokens (JWT) have been widely adopted for authentication in web applications, thanks to their simplicity and stateless nature. They allow the transmission of verified information between two parties, often used in login systems. However, despite their popularity, many security experts advise caution when using JWTs, particularly for session management.

In this article, we'll dive into the reasons why JWTs have raised concerns, and why many developers recommend alternative approaches.

What Is JWT?

A JSON Web Token (JWT) is a compact, URL-safe method for representing claims transferred between two parties. It is digitally signed, making it tamper-evident. The typical structure of a JWT includes three parts:

  1. Header: Specifies the signing algorithm.
  2. Payload: Contains claims or data.
  3. Signature: A hash of the header and payload to ensure integrity.

JWTs are often used for authentication. When a user logs in, the server issues a JWT that the client stores and attaches to future requests for secure resources. The server validates the token to authenticate the user, without having to maintain session data on the server.

So why do many people advise against using JWT?

1. JWT Size: It's Bigger Than You Think

One of the most notable drawbacks of using JWT is its size. JWTs carry their own payload (including claims such as user ID, roles, etc.), which means they are significantly larger than traditional session cookies.

A session cookie that stores a user ID might be just a few bytes.
A JWT, however, includes the user ID along with additional metadata, the payload, and a signature, making it much larger.
This additional size results in higher bandwidth usage since the token is sent with every request. This can be especially problematic in low-bandwidth situations or on mobile devices.

2. Token Revocation: A Major Security Issue

One of the most critical limitations of JWTs is the lack of easy token revocation. Once a JWT is issued, it remains valid until it expires, which can pose security risks.

The logout problem:
When a user logs out, you would expect that the session is invalidated immediately. But JWTs are stateless, and the server has no direct way of invalidating a token unless it's stored somewhere server-side, defeating the purpose of JWT being stateless. If a JWT has a long expiration time, an attacker could continue to use the stolen token even after the user logs out.

Stale tokens:
In a traditional session system, when a user's privileges are updated (for example, an admin is demoted to a regular user), the session on the server can immediately reflect that change. With JWTs, this doesn't happen until the token expires. This can allow a user to retain stale privileges for longer than intended, leading to potential security issues.

3. Redundant Signatures

JWTs are often praised for their digital signature capability, ensuring that the payload hasn’t been tampered with. However, modern web frameworks automatically sign and secure session cookies, which renders the JWT signature redundant in many cases.

Here’s the problem:

If you’re using JWTs in a cookie, your cookies are already signed and sometimes even encrypted by the framework.
Having both the cookie and the JWT carry a signature is overkill.
In practice, using traditional session cookies gives you the same level of security as JWTs, but without the additional complexity and size.

4. Security Vulnerabilities

JWTs are often not encrypted. This means the payload, which contains sensitive user information, is base64-encoded but not hidden. If someone can intercept the token, they can easily decode the payload to view its contents.

Vulnerabilities in certain situations:
Man-in-the-middle attacks: If the JWT is not transmitted over HTTPS, an attacker can intercept the token, gaining access to the user’s session.
Token tampering: While the signature ensures the token hasn’t been tampered with, issues arise when using weak signing algorithms. In some cases, attackers have been able to bypass JWT signatures with algorithm spoofing attacks, resulting in severe security breaches.
To mitigate these issues, it’s crucial to always use HTTPS and robust signing algorithms, but even then, certain vulnerabilities persist.

5. Lack of Built-In Expiry Control

While JWTs do offer an expiration time (exp), the expiration is client-side, meaning clients continue using the token until it expires. If a token is compromised, the attacker can use it until it reaches its expiration, no matter how much time is left.

This can cause serious security risks, especially for long-lived tokens. In contrast, traditional session management allows you to invalidate sessions immediately, providing better control over active sessions.

6. Complicating Simple Use Cases

For many authentication systems, using JWTs can be overkill. Traditional session-based authentication (using cookies and server-stored session data) handles most use cases effectively without the need for complex token management or the added risks of stateless JWTs.

For example:

If your app only needs to track logged-in users, a simple cookie-based approach provides the same security with less complexity.
Many modern web frameworks automatically manage cookies, signing, and encryption for you, making the need for JWT redundant in a standard login/logout flow.

Conclusion: When Not to Use JWT

While JWT can be useful for specific scenarios, such as API authorization or one-time data transfers, it's often not the best choice for session management in most web applications. Traditional session cookies, especially those offered by modern frameworks, are smaller, more secure, and easier to manage.

JWTs are not ideal if:

  1. You need easy token revocation.
  2. You want to avoid excessive bandwidth use.
  3. You’re working with sensitive, long-lived sessions.

In short, while JWT offers a stateless, self-contained approach to authentication, it introduces potential security and performance issues that many developers should carefully consider. Before adopting JWT for your project, evaluate your needs and ensure that it's the right tool for the job.

That's all for today.

And also, share your favourite web dev resources to help the beginners here!

Connect with me:@ LinkedIn and checkout my Portfolio.

Explore my YouTube Channel! If you find it useful.

Please give my GitHub Projects a star ⭐️

Thanks for 31784! 🤗

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Terabox Video Player