In essence, Salesforce demands extensive testing, and organizations often face challenges with the cost and effort involved in testing it. Automation Salesforce testing offers a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to manual testing, allowing organizations to embrace DevOps and continuous development practices. By utilizing automation, organizations can reduce their test cycles while ensuring the stability of their critical business processes. Let’s check how it works:

Automation expedites the testing process

Manual testing involves lengthy feedback loops where testers and QA teams communicate about issues encountered during testing, such as a form not displaying correctly after adding a new field. Test automation enables instant feedback loops, allowing developers to expedite the transition of code from development to build and embrace DevOps practices. Virtual machines can continuously run tests throughout the day and night, unlike manual testers.

Salesforce regression testing poses challenges for manual testers due to its repetitive and tedious nature. Regression tests are typically conducted before, during, and after a release, consuming a significant amount of manual testers’ time. By automating this repetitive task, testers can allocate their time to more valuable activities. Additionally, since virtual machines eliminate human errors, development teams spend less time fixing bugs.

Automation reduces testing costs

Many organizations exceed their testing budgets or timelines by manually testing numerous non-critical processes or failing to prioritize the right processes. Consequently, they end up spending a significant amount of money fixing bugs that make their way into production.

According to the Systems Sciences Institute at IBM, fixing bugs discovered late in the software development lifecycle costs 15 times more than fixing bugs identified early on. Automated testing mitigates this issue by enabling continuous testing, resulting in the early detection of bugs and reducing their cost to fix.

Moreover, manual testing processes lack efficiency in handling repetitive tests. With time, the cost of testing applications increases because of added labor required to maintain these tests. On the other hand, automated testing is time-saving option as once the test scripts are created, they can be reused time and again at no extra cost.

Risk reduction through automation

By implementing automated testing, organizations can shift their testing process to an earlier stage in the software development lifecycle, known as “shift-left testing.” This approach allows for the early detection of bugs, which not only reduces the cost of fixing them compared to later stages but also prevents them from causing widespread issues within the organization.

Furthermore, automation helps reduce risk by relying on virtual machines to perform tests instead of human testers. These machines do not experience fatigue from repetitive tasks as manual testers do, and they provide a comprehensive audit trail for compliance purposes.

Conclusion

Automated testing proves to be a valuable solution for the challenges associated with testing Salesforce applications. Opkey offers automation technology that guarantees certification by providing comprehensive test coverage for all updates within the Salesforce platform. Opkey’s no-code test automation for enterprises offers a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to manual testing, allowing employees to generate and automate test cases with just one click and saving 75% IT costs.