Breaking the Myths Associated With Salesforce Automation Testing

Rohit Bhandari - Dec 14 '23 - - Dev Community

Image description
Salesforce is one of the most used CRM tools worldwide, and testing is essential for organizations to optimize the performance of Salesforce. Due to the frequent updates in Salesforce, almost everyone who uses CRM understands that testing is vital. However, testing is performed in two ways; manual and automation. There is a constant debate going on whether to ‘automate or not.’ Approximately 5% of organizations automate their Salesforce testing, irrespective of knowing that automation saves money and time.

Moreover, many companies have started incorporating automation testing Salesforce. Still, the adoption of Salesforce test automation has been slower compared to the other industries. One of the main reasons behind that is that people have a lot of miscommunication that hindered the growth of automation testing in Salesforce. In this blog, we will explore the misconceptions and bust them.

Automating the Salesforce Testing is Too Expensive

There is a common myth that automation testing of Salesforce is prohibitively expensive. No doubt, there are initial investment costs businesses need to pay for setting up automation frameworks & tools and using their resources. In the long term, the benefits of Salesforce automation testing outweigh the investment. Automating Salesforce testing can help businesses save time and reduce manual efforts, reducing labor costs. It can also save you a lot of money, as poor testing may lead to downtime, resulting in a waste of financial resources.

Automation Can Eliminate Manual Testing Completely

Some believe that once automation is implemented, manual testing becomes obsolete and replaces jobs. No, it’s not true. You can replace the manual testing by incorporating automation in Salesforce. In reality, automation and manual testing have their place in the testing process. Automation testing Salesforce complements manual testing by taking care of repetitive tasks and regression testing, resulting in less time required for testing. On the other hand, manual testing is essential for exploratory testing and usability assessment. In a nutshell, tools can’t replace human judgment and can offer better results together.

No Need for Tester Anymore

There is a myth that incorporating automation in Salesforce testing can eliminate the need for testers, as tools can handle all tasks, and anyone operates the tool. Wait, don’t go too far, as no one can replace the skilled testers because they understand the system’s layout, matrics, and functions. Replacing the testers is not easy as one needs to interpret the result correctly, and even if they don’t know how to code, they must be familiar with your app.

Test Automation is Vague

Many believe that automation testing Salesforce is the latest trend and will only last for a while. But, it’s not true, as the industry is changing continuously, and automation becomes essential for the increasing pace of software development. Manual testing doesn’t keep up with the speed of development and is also prone to humans, costing a lot of money. The testing industry is increasing daily, and automation testing is here to help the testers.

Eliminates the Need for Test Strategy and Guarantees 100% Test Coverage

The misconception is that adaption automation testing Salesforce is enough without a well-defined test. It’s not true, as it can lead to inadequate testing. For better Salesforce applications, one needs to adopt a comprehensive test strategy that includes automation and manual testing.

Automating Salesforce doesn’t guarantee 100% test coverage but increases the test coverage compared to manual testing. There should be some cases that might be challenging to automate. A thoughtful testing strategy, including manual and automated testing, can provide comprehensive coverage.

Open-Source Tools Are Better to Use Compared to the Codeless Tool

There is a misconception among people that open-source tools like Selenium are better, as they allow APIs to automate Salesforce testing. Many organizations get attracted to tools like Selenium because it is free; however, automating testing with open-source tools requires writing the code.

Generally, open-source tools take hours to weeks in automation testing Salesforce. On the other hand, no code test automation tools like Opkey take only a few hours to get started. It saves time and resources, like labor costs. Codeless tool allows you to perform the testing without programming knowledge.

Automation is Only Suitable for Large Projects

There is a misconception that automation is only for large projects with more resources. But it’s not true, as automation testing in Salesforce works for any digital ecosystem irrespective of project size. For instance, a small project can automate Salesforce testing with limited resources. That’s where codeless tools like Opkey come in.

Opkey: One-stop Destination to Automate the Salesforce Testing

People have various misconceptions about automation testing Salesforce, so having a clear understanding of the limitations and capabilities of Salesforce automation becomes essential. If you are also looking to automate Salesforce testing within your organization, you can choose Opkey. It is a codeless tool that streamlines the testing and covers all your needs. It is a one-stop solution for all Salesforce testing needs. Contact Opkey by visiting its website to learn more about automation testing in Salesforce.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Terabox Video Player